Clashing priorities point to compromise on North Korea
The planned US-North Korea summit spotlights a range of possible futures for the Korean peninsula
Source: Oxford Analytica
Outlook
How desirable or acceptable each possible outcome is determines a country’s hierarchy of priorities. The greater the convergence between countries and the further towards one extreme, the more likely a given outcome.
The best-case realistic near-term scenario is a moratorium on North Korea’s further nuclear weapons development in return for tacit acceptance as a nuclear state.
The worst-case near-term scenario is a US strike against North Korea. Despite the current rapprochement, this is not out of the question; if negotiations break down or US President Donald Trump feels their outcome is inadequate, he may yet decide that peace has been tried and failed.
Impacts
- Denuclearisation is the top priority only for Washington -- and even Washington could well settle for less.
- Denuclearisation is probably off limits for Pyongyang, though it may make far-future promises it does not plan to honour.
- Beijing and Seoul will work hard to make sure any US-North Korea settlement takes their interests into account.
- The US troops in South Korea are Pyongyang’s greatest grievance; their withdrawal is Seoul’s greatest fear (besides war).
See also
- Japan-US priorities diverge on North Korea abductees - Jun 7, 2018
- US-North Korea dialogue may outlast sunken summit - May 25, 2018
- More graphic analysis